tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-506492938749742916.post1606502376164118241..comments2010-03-12T11:12:58.898ZComments on Internet's Best Secrets: Image ReconstructionCarlos Martinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06977756139964818233carlosmmartins@gmail.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-506492938749742916.post-76605152945307863352010-03-12T11:12:58.889Z2010-03-12T11:12:58.889ZIndeed, it's a great algortihm, although HQX is sp...Indeed, it's a great algortihm, although HQX is specifically targeting line drawings and wouldn't fare that well with photograph-like pictures.Carlos Martinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06977756139964818233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-506492938749742916.post-65729605983626499022010-03-12T10:58:43.682Z2010-03-12T10:58:43.682ZYou can get "sharply defined" with this too:
en.w...You can get "sharply defined" with this too:<br /><br />en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HqxAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-506492938749742916.post-80925957464593817242010-03-07T15:53:45.110Z2010-03-07T15:53:45.110ZGuess we have to take their word for it:
"Candès e...Guess we have to take their word for it:<br />"Candès expected the phantom on his screen to get slightly cleaner. But then suddenly he saw it sharply defined and perfect in every detail — rendered, as though by magic, from the incomplete data."Carlos Martinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06977756139964818233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-506492938749742916.post-57558270616736037722010-03-05T20:39:04.887Z2010-03-05T20:39:04.887ZNo actual results were posted in the wired.com art...No actual results were posted in the wired.com article. No real sample images. How how do you know the results were "amazing"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com